credential stuffing volumes after the latest combo-list leak sounds like a narrow topic. It turns out to touch almost every part of how an edge network behaves under attack.
Observability first
Every mitigation decision is logged with its reasons, and every log line can be traced to the rule and score components that produced it. When a customer asks why a request was challenged, the answer is a link, not a guess.
Logs stream to the customer’s SIEM within seconds, which also means their security team sees attacks in the same tools they use for everything else.
What we got wrong
Our first version challenged too eagerly on mobile networks, where thousands of real users share a handful of carrier-grade NAT addresses. Reputation that is shared is reputation that is noisy.
We now weight fingerprint consistency and session behaviour far more heavily than IP reputation for traffic from known mobile carrier ranges.
Measuring success
We track three numbers for every incident: time to mitigation, the share of attack traffic that reached the origin, and the share of legitimate traffic that was challenged. The first should be under a second, the second under 0.1% and the third under 1%.
Those numbers go into every incident report, and they are the same numbers we are measured against in our SLA.
Compliance is a side effect
Regulators increasingly ask for evidence of resilience, not just promises. An incident timeline with start, peak, vectors and impact is exactly the evidence DORA and NIS2 ask for — and it falls out of good observability for free.
We export incident reports in formats auditors can file without anyone rewriting them.
Testing in production, safely
Every rule starts in log mode. We replay the previous seven days of traffic through it and show exactly which requests it would have affected before anyone can promote it to challenge or block.
This one feature has prevented more incidents than any detection we have ever shipped.
Challenges beat blocks
Blocking lists go stale within minutes when attackers rotate through residential proxies. Proof-of-work does not care where a request comes from; it only cares whether the client is willing to pay the cost.
For a real browser that cost is a few hundred milliseconds, once per session. For a botnet sending a million requests a minute it is a million puzzles a minute — and at that point the attack stops being cheap.
As always, questions and corrections are welcome at [email protected].
Nice to read a vendor blog that admits what went wrong.
How does the proof-of-work challenge behave on older Android devices? Any numbers below Android 10?
Our auditors asked for exactly this kind of incident evidence under DORA.
We had the exact false-positive issue with CGNAT carriers. The weighting change makes sense.
Our auditors asked for exactly this kind of incident evidence under DORA.
The point about origin IPs leaking through certificate transparency logs is underrated.
Thanks — sharing this with our on-call team.