This post is about how we deploy rule changes to every edge in under 30 seconds. It started, as most of our posts do, with an incident that did not go the way we expected.
What we got wrong
Our first version challenged too eagerly on mobile networks, where thousands of real users share a handful of carrier-grade NAT addresses. Reputation that is shared is reputation that is noisy.
We now weight fingerprint consistency and session behaviour far more heavily than IP reputation for traffic from known mobile carrier ranges.
The economics behind it
A booter service rents out a 100 Gbps attack for less than the price of a pizza. Defending against it with bandwidth alone is a race you lose. Defending against it by making each malicious request cost more than it earns is a race you win.
This is the entire idea behind never metering attack traffic: our costs scale with filtering, not with your invoice.
Compliance is a side effect
Regulators increasingly ask for evidence of resilience, not just promises. An incident timeline with start, peak, vectors and impact is exactly the evidence DORA and NIS2 ask for — and it falls out of good observability for free.
We export incident reports in formats auditors can file without anyone rewriting them.
Challenges beat blocks
Blocking lists go stale within minutes when attackers rotate through residential proxies. Proof-of-work does not care where a request comes from; it only cares whether the client is willing to pay the cost.
For a real browser that cost is a few hundred milliseconds, once per session. For a botnet sending a million requests a minute it is a million puzzles a minute — and at that point the attack stops being cheap.
Lessons for your own runbook
Know who can change DNS at two in the morning. Know your origin IPs and who can rotate them. Know which routes are expensive, and have a rate limit ready for each of them.
Most outages during attacks are not caused by the attack itself but by rushed changes made while under pressure.
The numbers
Across the last quarter, 71% of challenged clients never attempted a solution, 24% solved one challenge and then behaved normally, and 5% solved challenges repeatedly while continuing to attack — the last group is where analysts spend their time.
Median added latency for legitimate visitors that were challenged was 280 ms on desktop and 410 ms on mid-range Android devices.
Protecting the origin
None of this matters if the attacker can reach your origin directly. Historical DNS records, certificate transparency logs and misconfigured subdomains leak origin addresses all the time.
Allow-list the edge ranges, enable authenticated origin pulls and treat any origin IP that ever appeared in public DNS as burned.
{ "match": { "path": "/account/reset", "risk": ">= 32" }, "action": "challenge" }
The full incident data behind this post is available to customers in the dashboard under Reports.
Nice to read a vendor blog that admits what went wrong.
We had the exact false-positive issue with CGNAT carriers. The weighting change makes sense.
Great to hear, thanks for sharing your experience.
Any plans to support per-tenant limits keyed on a JWT claim?
Thanks — sharing this with our on-call team.
Nice to read a vendor blog that admits what went wrong.